Norwegian phonology
The sound system of Norwegian resembles that of Swedish. There is considerable variation among the dialects, and all pronunciations are considered by official policy to be equally correct - there is no official spoken standard, although it can be said that Eastern Norwegian Bokmål speech has an unofficial spoken standard, called Urban East Norwegian or Standard East Norwegian, loosely based on the speech of the literate classes of the Oslo area. This variant is the most common one taught to foreign students.
Despite there being no official standard variety of Norwegian, Urban East Norwegian has traditionally been used in public venues such as theatre and TV, although today local dialects are used extensively in spoken and visual media.
The background for this lack of agreement is that after the dissolution of Denmark–Norway in 1814, the upper classes would speak in what was perceived as the Danish language, which with the rise of Norwegian romantic nationalism gradually fell out of favour. In addition, Bergen, not Oslo, was the larger and more influential city in Norway until the 19th century. See the article on the Norwegian language conflict for further information.
Unless noted otherwise, this article describes the phonology of Urban East Norwegian.
Consonants
- are laminal, either alveolar or denti-alveolar.
- are aspirated fully voiceless, whereas are unaspirated, either fully voiceless or partially voiced. After within the same syllable, only unaspirated voiceless stops occur.
- is dentalized laminal alveolar or non-retracted apical alveolar.
- is pronounced with protruded lips. The degree of protrusion depends on the rounding of the following vowel.
- is a fricative. The friction is normally glottal, but sometimes it is dorsal: palatal when near front vowels, velar near back vowels. It can be voiced between two voiced sounds.
- are partially voiced or fully voiceless when they occur after . The flap is also partially voiced or fully voiceless when it occurs postvocalically before.
- The approximants may be realized as fricatives :
- * is sometimes a fricative, especially before a pause and in emphatic pronunciation.
- * There is not an agreement about the frequency of occurrence of the fricative allophone of :
- ** states that is sometimes a fricative.
- ** states that the fricative variant of occurs often, especially before and after close vowels and in energetic pronunciation.
- is in process of changing from laminal denti-alveolar to apical alveolar, which leads to neutralization with the retroflex allophone. Laminal realization is still possible before vowels, after front and close vowels and after consonants that are not coronal, and is obligatory after. A velarized laminal occurs after mid back vowels, open back vowels, and sometimes also after the close back vowels. However, states that at least in Oslo, the laminal variant is not velarized, and the difference is only between an apical and a laminal realization.
- is an voiced apical alveolar flap. It is occasionally trilled, e.g. in emphatic speech.
- Retroflex allophones have been variously described as apical alveolar and apical postalveolar.
- alternates with in many words, but there is a small number of words in which only occurs.
- are velar, whereas is palatal.
- may be palatal, but is often alveolo-palatal instead. It is unstable in many dialects, and younger speakers in Bergen, Stavanger and Oslo merge with into.
- Glottal stop may be inserted before word-initial vowels. In very emphatic speech, it can also be inserted word-medially in stressed syllables beginning with a vowel.
The retroflex flap,, colloquially known to Norwegians as tjukk l, is a Central Scandinavian innovation that exists in Eastern Norwegian, the southmost Northern dialects, and the most eastern Western Norwegian dialects. It is supposedly non-existent in most Western and Northern dialects. Today there is doubtlessly distinctive opposition between and in the dialects that do have, e.g. gard 'farm' and gal 'crazy' in many Eastern Norwegian dialects. Although traditionally an Eastern Norwegian dialect phenomenon, it was considered vulgar, and for a long time it was avoided. Nowadays it is considered standard in the Eastern and Central Norwegian dialects, but is still clearly avoided in high-prestige sociolects or standardized speech. This avoidance calls into question the status of as a phoneme in certain sociolects.
According to Nina Grønnum, tjukk l in Trøndersk is actually a postalveolar lateral flap.
Vowels
- Unless preceding another vowel within the same word, all unstressed vowels are short.
- In unstressed syllables, tends to reduce to a simple schwa.
- The phonemic status of in Urban East Norwegian is unclear since and patterns as allophones of and /eː/ before the flaps and. However, there are also words in which is realized as, despite the following flap, such as "ser" 'see'. also occurs in the diphthongs and.
- Urban East Norwegian also features a few non-phonemic diphthongs, which are. can be analyzed as sequences of and which is allophonically labialized to after rounded vowels. can be analyzed as a sequence of and .
- * The second element of is often realized as labiodental.
- * Some speakers have an additional diphthong in their inventory which, like and, is restricted to loanwords. For such speakers, is best analyzed as +, whereas is the phonemic representation of the marginal.
- * Another diphthong is , which appears only in the word hui.
Symbols
- The vowels as well as the allophone of are invariably transcribed with and.
- are most often transcribed with, but may be transcribed with an obsolete by older sources. In addition, uses both and for. This article transcribes those vowels with.
- is most often transcribed with, yet this article uses, following.
- The open back are most often transcribed with, but transcribes them with. This article uses the former set.
- The short close vowels are transcribed with either or. The short is occasionally transcribed with or a non-IPA symbol instead, whereas is transcribed with an obsolete symbol in some older sources. This article uses.
- The short mid front vowels are transcribed with either or. This article uses.
Phonetic realization
- are unrounded, whereas are rounded:
- * The close have been variously described as protruded and compressed as well as compressed and protruded. The backness of has also been variously described as central and near-front. Therefore, may be differentiated from by backness and the type of rounding or even only by the type of rounding.
- * The close back are compressed.
- * The mid are protruded.
- The height and backness of Norwegian vowels is as follows:
- * have been variously described as near-close and close. In addition, and are more peripheral than the canonical values of IPA .
- * are phonetically close.
- * is mid front.
- * are close-mid. is front, yet has been variously described as front and central.
- * has been variously described as open-mid front and mid central.
- * has been variously described as near-open back and close-mid back.
- * has been variously described as mid back and close-mid back.
- * have been variously described as near-open front and open central.
- * are open back.
- are frequently realized as centering diphthongs. can also be realized as, yet are always monophthongal. However, according to, the diphthongal variants of are opening, not centering.
Accent
There are significant variations in the realization of the pitch accent between dialects. In most of Eastern Norway, including the capital Oslo, the so-called low pitch dialects are spoken. In these dialects, accent 1 uses a low flat pitch in the first syllable, while accent 2 uses a high, sharply falling pitch in the first syllable and a low pitch in the beginning of the second syllable. In both accents, these pitch movements are followed by a rise of intonational nature, the size of which signals emphasis/focus and which corresponds in function to the normal accent in languages that lack lexical tone, such as English. That rise culminates in the final syllable of an accentual phrase, while the fall to utterance-final low pitch that is so common in most languages is either very small or absent. On the other hand, in most of western and northern Norway accent 1 is falling, while accent 2 is rising in the first syllable and falling in the second syllable or somewhere around the syllable boundary.
The two tones can be transcribed on the first vowel as for accent 1 and for accent 2; the modern reading of the IPA tone diacritics corresponds to the pronunciation of eastern Norway, whereas an older tradition of using diacritics to represent the shape of the pitch trace corresponds to the pronunciation of western Norway.
Accent 1 generally occurs in words that were monosyllabic in Old Norse, and accent 2 in words that were polysyllabic.
Tonal accents and morphology
In many dialects, the accents take on a significant role in marking grammatical categories. Thus, the ending —en implies determinate form of a masculine monosyllabic noun, whereas -en denotes either determinate form of a masculine bisyllabic noun or an adjectivised noun/verb. Similarly, the ending —a denotes feminine singular determinate monosyllabic nouns or neuter plural determinate nouns, whereas the ending —a denotes the preterite of weak verbs, feminine singular determinate bisyllabic nouns.In Eastern Norwegian the tone difference may also be applied to groups of words, with different meaning as a result. Gro igjen for example, means 'grow anew' when pronounced with tone 1, but 'grow over' when pronounced with tone 2. In other parts of Norway, this difference is achieved instead by the shift of stress.
In compound words
In a compound word, the pitch accent is lost on one of the elements of the compound, but the erstwhile tonic syllable retains the full length of a stressed syllable.Monosyllabic tonal accents
In some dialects of Norwegian, mainly those from Nordmøre and Trøndelag to Lofoten, there may also be tonal opposition in monosyllables, as in vs. . In a few dialects, mainly in and near Nordmøre, the monosyllabic tonal opposition is also represented in final syllables with secondary stress, as well as double tone designated to single syllables of primary stress in polysyllabic words. In practice, this means that one gets minimal pairs like: vs. ; vs. ; vs. . Amongst the various views on how to interpret this situation, the most promising one may be that the words displaying these complex tones have an extra mora. This mora may have little or no effect on duration and dynamic stress, but is represented as a tonal dip.Other dialects with tonal opposition in monosyllabic words have done away with vowel length opposition. Thus, the words vs. have merged into in the dialect of Oppdal.