English clause syntax
This article describes the syntax of clauses in the English language, that is, the ways of combining and ordering constituents such as verbs and noun phrases to form a clause.
Types of clause
Clauses can be classified as independent and dependent. A typical sentence consists of one independent clause, possibly augmented by one or more dependent clauses.An independent clause is a simple sentence. Sentences can be classified according to the purpose or function of the sentence into declarative, interrogative, exclamatory sentence or imperative.
In interrogative main clauses, unless the subject is or contains the interrogative word, the verb precedes the subject: Are you hungry? Where am I?. However such inversion is only possible with an auxiliary or copular verb; if no such verb would otherwise be present, do-support is used.
In most imperative clauses the subject is absent: Eat your dinner! However imperative clauses may include the subject for emphasis: You eat your dinner!. The form of the verb is the base form of the verb, such as eat, write, be. Modal verbs do not have imperative forms. Negation uses do-support, even if the verb is be; see below. The imperative here refers to second-person forms; constructions for other persons may be formed periphrastically, e.g. Let's go; Let them eat cake.
A dependent clause may be finite, or non-finite. Particular types of dependent clause include relative clauses, content clauses and adverbial clauses.
In certain instances, clauses use a verb conjugated in the subjunctive mood; see English subjunctive.
Clauses can be nested within each other, sometimes up to several levels. For example, the sentence I know the woman who says she saw your son drinking beer contains a non-finite clause within a content clause within a relative clause within an independent declarative clause.
Non-finite clauses
A non-finite clause is one in which the main verb is in a non-finite form, namely an infinitive, past participle, or -ing form ; for how these forms are made, see English verbs.The internal syntax of a non-finite clause is generally similar to that of a finite clause, except that there is usually no subject. The following types exist:
- bare infinitive clause, such as go to the party in the sentence let her go to the party.
- to-infinitive clause, such as to go to the party. Although there is no subject in such a clause, the performer of the action can be expressed with a preceding prepositional phrase using for: It would be a good idea for her to go to the party. The possibility of placing adjuncts between the to and the verb in such constructions has been the subject of dispute among prescriptive grammarians; see split infinitive.
- past participial clause, such as made a cake and seen to it. This is used in forming perfect constructions, as in he has made a cake; I had seen to it.
- present participial clause, such as being in good health. When such a clause is used as an adjunct to a main clause, its subject is understood to be the same as that of the main clause; when this is not the case, a subject can be included in the participial clause: The king being in good health, his physician was able to take a few days' rest.
- gerund clause. This has the same form as the [|above], but serves as a noun rather than an adjective or adverb. The pre-appending of a subject in this case is criticized by some prescriptive grammarians – see Fused participle.
- to-infinitive clauses – this is easy to use ; he is the man to talk to.
- past participial clauses – as used in forming passive voice constructions, and in some other uses, such as I want to get it seen to. In many such cases the performer of the action can be expressed using a prepositional phrase with by, as in the cake was made by Alan.
- gerund clauses – particularly after want and need, as in Your car wants/needs cleaning, and You want/need your head seeing to.
Constituents of a clause
English is an SVO language, that is, in simple declarative sentences the order of the main components is subject–verb–object.A typical finite clause consists of a noun phrase functioning as the subject, a finite verb, followed by any number of dependents of the verb. In some theories of grammar the verb and its dependents are taken to be a single component called a verb phrase or the predicate of the clause; thus the clause can be said to consist of subject plus predicate.
Dependents include any number of complements, and other modifiers of the verb. Noun phrase constituents which are personal pronouns or the pronoun who are marked for case, but otherwise it is word order alone that indicates which noun phrase is the subject and which the object.
The presence of complements depends on the pattern followed by the verb. A given verb may allow a number of possible patterns.
Some verbs can take two objects: an indirect object and a direct object. An indirect object precedes a direct one, as in He gave the dog a bone. However the indirect object may also be replaced with a prepositional phrase, usually with the preposition to or for, as in He gave a bone to the dog.
Adverbial adjuncts are often placed after the verb and object, as in I met John yesterday. However other positions in the sentence are also possible; see, and for "phrasal" particles, Phrasal verb. Another adverb which is subject to special rules is the negating word not; see below.
Objects normally precede other complements, as in I told him to fetch it. Other possible complements include prepositional phrases, such as for Jim in the clause They waited for Jim; predicative expressions, such as red in The ball is red; subordinate clauses, which may be introduced by a subordinating conjunction such as if, when, because, that, for example the that-clause in I suggest that you wait for her; and non-finite clauses, such as eating jelly in the sentence I like eating jelly.
Many English verbs are used together with a particle and with preposition phrases in constructions that are commonly referred to as "phrasal verbs". These complements often modify the meaning of the verb in an unpredictable way, and a verb-particle combination such as give up can be considered a single lexical item. The position of such particles in the clause is subject to different rules from other adverbs; for details see Phrasal verb.
English is not a "pro-drop" language – that is, unlike some languages, English requires that the subject of a clause always be expressed explicitly, even if it can be deduced from the form of the verb and the context, and even if it has no meaningful referent, as in the sentence It is raining, where the subject it is a dummy pronoun. Imperative and non-finite clauses are exceptions, in that they usually do not have a subject expressed.
Adjuncts are constituents which are not required by the main verb, and can be removed without leaving behind something ungrammatical. Adjuncts are usually adverbs or adverbial phrases or clauses.
Many clauses have as their finite verb an auxiliary, which governs a non-finite form of a lexical verb. For clauses of this type, see below.
Variations on SVO pattern
Variations on the basic SVO pattern occur in certain types of clause. The subject is absent in most imperative clauses and most non-finite clauses. For cases in which the verb or a verb complement is omitted, see.The verb and subject are inverted in most interrogative clauses. This requires that the verb be an auxiliary or copula. The same type of inversion occurs in certain other types of clause, particularly main clauses beginning with an adjunct having negative force, and some dependent clauses expressing a condition. For details see subject–auxiliary inversion and negative inversion.
A somewhat different type of inversion may involve a wider set of verbs ; see subject–verb inversion.
In certain types of clause an object or other complement becomes zero or is brought to the front of the clause: see.
Clauses with auxiliary verbs
In many English clauses, the finite verb is an auxiliary verb, whose complement is some type of non-finite clause. For example, in the clause he is eating his dinner, the finite verb is the auxiliary is, whose complement is the participial clause eating his dinner. In some cases the non-finite clause itself has an auxiliary as its main verb, with another embedded non-finite clause as complement. For example:- He has.
The form of each lexical or auxiliary verb is determined by the auxiliary preceding it. The first auxiliary is conjugated as a finite verb in present or past tense: the modals are invariant, but the other auxiliaries may take the forms have, has, had, am, is, are, be, was, were, do, does, did. have, being, or
The principal auxiliaries and the verb forms they govern are:
- Modal verbs. They govern a bare infinitive.
- The verb have to express perfect aspect. These govern a past participle.
- The verb be to express progressive aspect. These govern a present participle.
- The verb be to express passive voice. These govern a past participle.
- The verb do to supply an auxiliary in functions where one is required, or to provide emphasis. This is described in more detail in the article on do-support.
A clause containing the maximum number of auxiliaries might therefore be I will have been being operated on for six hours. Here the modal will is the finite verb; perfect have is in bare infinitive form, progressive be is in the past participle form been, passive be is in the present participle form being, and the lexical verb is in the past participle form operated.
Constructions of this type serve a variety of functions, including the expression of aspect, voice and modality. The meaning of combinations of these auxiliary verbs are presented in more detail [|later in this article].
Some of these constructions are described, particularly in teaching contexts, as tenses – for example, is eating is represented as the "present progressive tense" of eat. The series of auxiliaries and non-finite verb form is treated as a unit. Thus in the examples above, the strings is eating and has been eating may be presented as forms of the verb eat, with his dinner serving as their object.
Non-finite constructions exist for combinations of auxiliary verbs other than the modals verbs or do:
- infinitive: take, be taken, be taking, have been taking, etc.
- present participial : taking, being taken, having taken, etc.
- going to
- have to
- am to, was to, etc.
- able to
- about to
Fronting and zeroing
Fronting of various elements can also occur for reasons of focus; occasionally even an object or other verbal complement can be fronted rather than appear in its usual position after the verb, as in I met Tom yesterday, but Jane I haven't seen for ages.
In certain types of non-finite clause, and in some relative clauses, an object or a preposition complement is absent. For example, in I like the cake you made, the words you made form a reduced relative clause in which the verb made has zero object. This can produce preposition stranding : I like the song you were listening to; Which chair did you sit on?
Negation
A clause is negated by the inclusion of the word not:- In a finite indicative clause in which the finite verb is an auxiliary or copula, the word not comes after that verb, often forming a contraction in n't: He will not win.
- In a finite indicative clause in which there is otherwise no auxiliary or copula, do-support is used to provide one: He does not want to win.
- In the above clause types, if there is inversion, the subject may come after the verb and before not, or after the contraction in n't: Do you not want to win? wish to attend...
- Negative imperatives are formed with do-support, even in the case of the copula: Don't be silly!
- The negative of the present subjunctive is made by placing not before the verb: ...that you not meet us; ...that he not be punished. The past subjunctive were is negated like the indicative.
- A non-finite clause is negated by placing not before the verb form: not to be outdone, not knowing what to do.
Elliptical clauses
- omitted verb between subject and complement, as in You love me, and I you.
- tag questions, as in He can't speak French, can he?.
- similar short sentences or clauses such as I can, there is, we will, etc., where the omitted non-finite clause or other complement is understood from what has gone before.
Meanings of clauses using auxiliary verbs
Overview
The various constructions with auxiliary verbs can be used to express aspect, voice and modality.English clauses can be described as having progressive aspect, perfect aspect, neither, or both. They can also be described as having active voice or passive voice. The following table shows these combinations:
The constructions given above are third-person singular present indicative. However, by changing the form of the finite verb in each case, equivalent forms can be constructed for other persons and numbers, for past tense, and for imperative and subjunctive mood.
The meanings of the aspects are as follows:
- The simple constructions can be used to express habitual action. In many contexts they can also be used to express single completed actions.
- Progressive constructions denote ongoing activity at a specific point of time or continuous activity over an extent of time.
- Perfect constructions are used to express actions or events that happened before a point in time, with an emphasis on the continuing effects of these at this point of time.
- Perfect progressive constructions are used to express ongoing activity that extends to a certain point in time.
This is illustrated in the table below with the modal might.
Modal | Perfect | Progressive | Passive | Lexical verb |
might | take | |||
might | be | taken | ||
might | be | taking | ||
might | be | being | taken | |
might | have | taken | ||
might | have | been | taken | |
might | have | been | taking | |
might | have | been | being | taken |
The modals are invariant, so in this case it is not possible to inflect for tense or mood. There are no imperative or non-finite forms.
The modal will, in some of its uses, expresses future time. Hence constructions using will as the modal in the above schema are often referred to as being instances of a future tense. Thus forms like will take can be called the simple future, will have taken the future perfect, and so on. Analogous terminology is used for the forms with would ; these are referred to as conditional forms. Sometimes shall and should are also used in this way: see shall and will.
Simple constructions
The simple constructions can be used to express habitual action. In many contexts they can also be used to express single completed actions.Affirmative | Negative | Interrogative | Negative interrogative | |
Present | He writes | He does not write | Does he write? | Does he not write? / Doesn't he write? |
Past | He wrote | He did not write | Did he write? | Did he not write? / Didn't he write? |
Future | He will write | He will not write | Will he write? | Will he not write? / Won't he write? |
Conditional | He would write | He would not write | Would he write? | Would he not write? / Wouldn't he write? |
The passive voice is formed using the appropriate form of the verb be followed by the past participle of the main verb, e.g. "He is written."
Present
The simple present has three main uses in English: First, it often identifies habitual or customary action referring to no specific time frame:Second, it is used with stative verbs to refer to a present situation:
Third, it can have a future meaning in two contexts :
The simple present has an intensive or emphatic construction with "do": He does write. In the negative and interrogative constructions, of course, this is identical to the non-emphatic constructions. It is typically used as a response to the question Does he write, whether that question is expressed or implied, and says that indeed, he does write.
The different syntactic behavior of the negative particle not and the negative inflectional suffix -n't in the interrogative constructions is also worth noting. In formal literary English of the sort in which contractions are avoided, not attaches itself to the main verb: Does he not write? When the colloquial contraction -n't is used, this attaches itself to the auxiliary do: Doesn't he write? This in fact is a contraction of a more archaic word order, still occasionally found in poetry: *Does not he write?'''
Past
The simple past is also called the preterite.The preterite is used for the English simple past tense. He wrote two more chapters about the dam at Kashagawigamog Lake.
This tense is used for a single event in the past, for past habitual action, and in chronological narration. Like the present simple, it has an emphatic variant with "do": he did write.
The simple past is distinct from the present perfect:
The preterite, when used to indicate habitual aspect, can often be replaced by a compound construction:
- When I was young, I played football or When I was young, I played football every Saturday.
- When I was young, I used to play football.
- When I was young, I would play football every Saturday.
Future
Shall can be used in place of will: see the article Shall and Will for a discussion of the two auxiliary verbs used to form the simple future in English.
Will and would can be used with a different meaning to futurity or conditionality:
- You will obey me!
- I will not do it!
- He will probably be home now.
- Usually, whenever I get home, I will drink a cup of tea.
- At that time, I would always drink tea in the morning.
- I would not do that.
It can also indicate a combination of futurity and intentional or volitional modality:
It can also indicate predictive modality — what the speaker intends as predictions about the future:
The will construction is occasionally used for statements about the present to indicate that they are speculative:
The will construction can be used to indicate strong volition in the present in the first person:
It can also be used to indicate habituality in the past, present and future:
There is also a future with "go" which is used with the infinitive of the action verb especially for intended actions and for the weather, and which is generally more common in colloquial speech:
The will/shall construction can be used for spontaneous decisions:
Present subjunctive
This form is always identical to the infinitive. This means that apart from the verb to be, it is distinct from the indicative present only in the third person singular and the obsolete second person singular.It is used to express wishes about the present or future:
It can be used to express present doubt, especially after if, whether, and lest and in set phrases:
The subordinate conjunction whether can be replaced by inversion of be and the subject:
It is also used in a mandative sense:
The present subjunctive can be written in the passive voice as in
Conditional
The conditional present is formed by combining the modal auxiliary would with the infinitive of the main verb:The conditional present is used principally in a main clause accompanied by an implicit or explicit doubt or "if-clause"; it may refer to conditional statements in present or future time:
Some varieties of English regularly use would in if clauses, but this is often considered non-standard: If you'd leave now, you'd be on time. Such use of would is widespread especially in spoken US English in all sectors of society, but these forms are not usually used in writing that is more formal. Nevertheless, some reliable sources simply label this usage as acceptable US English and no longer label it as colloquial.
There are exceptions, however, where would is used in British English too in seemingly counterfactual conditions, but these can usually be interpreted as a modal use of would: If you would listen to me once in a while, you might learn something. In cases in which the action in the if clause takes place after that in the main clause, use of would in counterfactual conditions is however considered standard and correct usage in even formal UK and US usage: If it would make Bill happy, I'd give him the money.
The auxiliary verbs could and might can also be used to indicate the conditional mood, as in the following:
Progressive constructions
constructions denote ongoing activity at a specific point of time or continuous activity over an extent of time. All verbal constructions can be made progressive, and these constructions are very common. Progressive constructions are also known as "continuous".Affirmative | Negative | Interrogative | Negative interrogative | |
Present | He is writing | He is not writing | Is he writing? | Is he not writing? / Isn't he writing? |
Past | He was writing | He was not writing | Was he writing? | Was he not writing? / Wasn't he writing? |
Future | He will be writing | He will not be writing | Will he be writing? | Will he not be writing? / Won't he be writing? |
Conditional | He would be writing | He would not be writing | Would he be writing? | Would he not be writing? / Wouldn't he be writing? |
The passive voice of the progressive is formed by the present progressive of to be followed by the past participle of the main verb, e.g. "He is being written."
Present
An important difference between the present progressive tense in English and many other languages with similar tenses is that the English present progressive must be used in many circumstances. In particular, a statement about an ongoing action at the present time normally must use the progressive. The simple present is used in the following circumstances:- A habitual statement: "I write letters every day."
- A general statement: "People write letters when they cannot telephone."
- A narrative action told in the present tense: "I get home, then I write a letter, then I eat dinner, then the phone rings and it's my girlfriend."
- With verbs that refer to states rather than actions: "I feel lonely", "I see a bear", "I have a large car", "I am a doctor".
With "have" and "be" the present progressive is even clearer in imparting a meaning of "currently ongoing action". Hence "??I am having a large car" would sound quite strange, and be almost uninterpretable, while "?I am being a doctor" still sounds strange but potentially might mean "I'm not a doctor but I'm temporarily trying to act like one". But there are a number of quite acceptable usages of progressive "have" and "be":
- "I have a baby" vs. "I am having a baby"
- "John is a pest" vs. "John is being a pest"
- "I have a problem" vs. "I am having a problem" ; e.g. "I am having a problem finding my glasses" vs. "I have a problem finding my glasses".
Word order differs here in the negative interrogative between the more formal is he not writing and the colloquial contraction isn't he writing?
Past
The past progressive construction indicates ongoing action in the pastThis construction is typically used for two events in parallel:
It can also be used for an interrupted action :
Further, it can be used to indicate continuing action at a specific time in the past:
It can also be used to refer to past action that occurred over a range of time and is viewed as an ongoing situation:
Future
This construction is used especially to indicate that an event will be in progress at a particular point in the future: This time tomorrow I will / shall be taking my driving test.The passive construction It will be being written is rarely used. If it is desired to express future progressivity in the passive voice, the construction It will be in the process of being written can be used.
Conditional
The conditional present progressive is used for the continuous aspect of the conditional construction; it describes a situation that would now be prevailing had it not been for some intervening event:The passive voice of the conditional present progressive can be formed as It would be being written, but since this construction is awkward the form It would be in the process of being written would be more common.
Perfect constructions
Perfect constructions are used to express actions or events that happened before a point in time, with an emphasis on the continuing effects of these at this point of time.The following table shows examples of perfect constructions being used with the pronoun "he":
Affirmative | Negative | Interrogative | Negative interrogative | |
Present | He has written | He has not written | Has he written? | Has he not written? / Hasn't he written? |
Past | He had written | He had not written | Had he written? | Had he not written? / Hadn't he written? |
Future | He will have written | He will not have written | Will he have written? | Will he not have written? / Won't he have written? |
Conditional | He would have written | He would not have written | Would he have written? | Would he not have written? / Wouldn't he have written? |
The passive voice is formed with by the present perfect of to be followed by the past participle of the main verb, e.g. "He has been written."
Present
The present perfect was traditionally just called the perfect.The distinction between the past and the present perfect can be subtle. In general, the present perfect occurs in cases where there is an explicitly or implicitly established present frame of reference. When the frame of reference is explicit, such as in the sentence "Whenever I get home, usually John has already arrived", the usage of the present perfect is clear, but in other cases it is less obvious.
- When an action indicates a change of state, the present perfect indicates that the resulting state still applies. "I have eaten" means "... and I'm no longer hungry", whereas "I ate" has no such implication. "The sign has changed" means "... and it is now different, so pay attention", whereas "The sign changed" does not specifically have that meaning; e.g. perhaps the sign changed back again.
- When a repeated or prolonged action is specified, the present perfect indicates that the time period in question goes up to the present. "I have visited Paris three times" specifically means "... in my life, up to the present time" while "I visited Paris three times" would normally only be used when a smaller time period is specifically indicated. "I have lived in Paris for five years" specifically means "I lived in Paris for five years some uncertain time ago and I don't live there now. I have an experience of Paris" while "I lived in Paris for five years" implies "You know what specific time I am talking about and the time when I lived in Paris is as important as the fact that I lived there." If one wants to imply that he/she still lives in Paris, he/she should ideally say: "I have been living in Paris for 5 years". This would imply an ongoing process of still living in Paris. However, people might use Present Perfect for an ongoing process, too and that is why you might hear a lot of follow up questions in conversations.
- When an explicitly past frame of reference is established by mentioning a particular time in the past, the present perfect cannot normally be used. That is, "I ate two minutes ago" not "*I have eaten two minutes ago" regardless of whether I'm hungry or not currently.
- With "already" or "yet", traditional usage calls for the present perfect: "Have you eaten yet? Yes, I've already eaten." However, current informal American speech tends to use the simple past: "Did you eat yet? Yes, I ate already."
In addition to these normal uses where the event is viewed from the present, the “have done” construct is used with a future perspective in temporal clauses where other languages would use the future perfect: When you have written it, show it to me.
The term "perfect" was first applied in discussions of Latin grammar, to refer to a tense which expresses a completed action. It was then applied to a French tense which has a similar use to the Latin perfect, and then was transferred to the English tense which looks morphologically something like the French perfect. In fact, the English perfect is often used precisely in situations where Latin would use the imperfect — for past actions which are not finished but continue into the present.
''Have got''
In colloquial English, particularly British English, the present perfect of the verb get, namely have got or has got, is frequently used in place of the simple present indicative of have when denoting possession, broadly defined. For example:- Formal: I have three brothers; Does he have a car?
- Informal: I've got three brothers; Has he got a car?
The same applies in the expression of present obligation: I've got to go now may be used in place of I have to go now.
In very informal registers, the contracted form of have or has may be omitted altogether: I got three brothers.
Past
The past perfect is also known as the pluperfect; it is formed by combining the preterite of to have with the past participle of the main verb:The past perfect is used when the action occurred in the past before another action in the past. It is used when speaking of the past to indicate the relative time of two past actions, one occurring before the other; i.e. a "past before the past".
The past time of perspective could be stated explicitly:
or it can be understood from previous information:
The past time of perspective can simply be implied by the context:
It is sometimes possible to use the simple past instead of the past perfect, but only where there is no ambiguity in the meaning. For instance, the second example above could be written:
Understood within the above context, this still means that I first invited Jim then later ate the meal.
However, concurrent past events are also possible, indicated by dual simple past tenses in both verbs. Consider the following:
This means both past events happened at the same time: he left at the same time as we arrived.
The past perfect can also be used to express a counterfactual statement about the past:
Here, the first clause refers to an unreal state in the past, and the entire construction is a conditional sentence.
Future
The future perfect is formed by combining, in this order, will or shall, the auxiliary verb have, and the past participle of the main verb. It indicates an action that either is completed sometime prior to a future time of perspective or an ongoing action that continues to a future time of perspective:Conditional
The conditional perfect construction is used for conditional situations occurring in the past; it expresses thoughts which are or may be contrary to present fact:Some varieties of English regularly use would have in if clauses, but this is often non-standard: If you 've told me, we could've done something about it. Such use of would is widespread especially in spoken US English in all sectors of society, but is incorrect and is not usually used in more formal writing.
There are exceptions, however, where would is used in British English too in seemingly counterfactual conditions, but these can usually be interpreted as a modal use of would: If you would have listened to me once in a while, you might have learned something. In cases in which the action in the if clause takes place after that in the main clause, use of would in if clauses is however considered standard and correct usage in even formal UK and US usage: If it would have made Bill happy, I'd have given him the money.
Perfect progressive constructions
Perfect progressive constructions are used to express ongoing activity that extends to a certain point in time.Affirmative | Negative | Interrogative | Negative interrogative | |
Present | He has been writing | He has not been writing | Has he been writing? | Has he not been writing? / Hasn't he been writing? |
Past | He had been writing | He had not been writing | Had he been writing? | Had he not been writing? / Hadn't he been writing? |
Future | He will have been writing | He will not have been writing | Will he have been writing? | Will he not have been writing? / Won't he have been writing? |
Conditional | He would have been writing | He would not have been writing | Would he have been writing? | Would he not have been writing? / Wouldn't he have been writing? |
For passive voice clauses, the present participle is replaced with "being" followed by the past participle.
Present
It is used for unbroken action in the past which continues right up to the present. I have been writing this paper all morning.The present perfect progressive is used for denoting the action which was in progress and has just finished or is still going on.
For example,
Sentences referring to an expanse of time use the present perfect continuous if ongoing action is referred to. For example,
However, with stative verbs, or if the situation is considered permanent, the present perfect non-progressive construction is used.
For example,
Thus, if the whole period is referred to, for is used, but when the reference is to the starting point of the action, since is used.
The construction It has been being written, while following the usual pattern for the formation of the passive voice, is very rarely used. Occasionally, when it is desired to express the receiving of an action in the past and continuing to the present, the phrasal construction It has been in the process of being written is used. Here the present perfect construction is applied to to be, and the continuity and the passive voice are applied to the main verb in non-finite form in a noun phrase.
Past
The past perfect progressive is also known as the pluperfect progressive , the past perfect continuous, and the pluperfect continuous. It is formed by combining, in this order, the preterite of to have, the past participle of to be, and the present participle of the main verb.The past perfect progressive relates to the past perfect as the present perfect progressive relates to the present perfect.
The construction It had been being written is very rarely used. To convey the past perfect progressive in the passive voice, the construction It had been in the process of being written can be used.
Future
The future perfect progressive, also called the future perfect continuous, is formed by combining, in this order, will or shall, the auxiliary have, the past participle been, and the present participle of the main verb.This construction is used for an event that will still be in progress at a certain point in the future: By 8:00 he will have been writing for five hours.
The construction It will have been being written is never used. The construction It will have been in the process of being written can be used to indicate the continuous receiving of an action prior to some time in the future.
Conditional
Rather than the very rarely used awkward construction It would have been being written, the conditional perfect progressive can be expressed in the passive voice as in It would have been in the process of being written.Subjunctive constructions
Past subjunctive
The past subjunctive is used to express hypotheses about the present or future: it is used to describe unreal or hypothetical conditions. It consists of the verb were in all persons and numbers, either as the main verb or as a helping verb combined with the infinitive of the main verb.It usually appears in "if clauses" of conditional sentences.
Examples include:
- If I were rich, I would retire to the South of France.
- If I were a boy,....
- Were I to speak, I would do so softly.
- If I were walking down the road, I would greet him.
- If I was walking down the road, I would greet him.
- I'd rather that it were more substantial.
- I wish she were here.
The imperfect subjunctive can be written in the passive voice as in
or
Future subjunctive
A future subjunctive for use in "if clauses" can be constructed using the conjugated form of the verb "to be" plus the infinitive or by using the modal auxiliary verb "should" :These constructions can alternatively be expressed with inversion of the order of were or should and the subject, with if omitted:
If the were to construction is used in the "if clause", the word would is used in the main clause; if the should form is used in the "if clause", either will or would can be used in the main clause, depending on whether the event is very hypothetical or is quite possible.
The passive voice can be applied to the future subjunctive as in any of the following:
or
Uses of non-finite constructions
The various types of non-finite clauses described above have a number of uses besides the constructions with auxiliaries already described.Infinitive
An infinitive phrase begins with the base form of the verb. Infinitive phrases can be viewed as part of finite clauses where they are introduced in verb catenae by an auxiliary verb or by a certain limited class of main verbs. They are also often frequently introduced by a main verb followed by the particle to. Further, infinitives introduced by to can function as noun phrases, or even as modifiers of nouns. The following table illustrates these environments:An infinitive phrase begins with the bare form of the first verb, and is usually co-ordinated by the word "to":
- I need to get my work done
- For them to be with us in this time of crisis is evidence of their friendship.
- I heard them shout.
The placement of an adverbial modifier directly after the to of an infinitive phrase is called a split infinitive, and is sometimes regarded as a grammatical or stylistic error.
Present participle and gerund
A present participle phrase uses the present participle form of the verb, ending in "-ing".It may be used in progressive constructions:
The present participle may be used in non-finite constructions such as the following:
- Having spoken, he turned and left.
- Looking out the window, he saw a car go by.
- Having been beaten at poker, he had little money left.
- I saw them digging a hole.
Often distinguishing between a gerund and a progressive active participle is not easy; the line between the two non-finite verb forms is not clear.
A present participle may function as an adjective modifying a noun, in which case it is known as a gerundive: "The dancing girls".
Past participle
The past participles of strong verbs in Germanic languages are irregular ; their form is idiosyncratic. The past participles of weak verbs, in contrast, are regular; their form is formed with the suffix -ed.Past participles are used in perfect and passive constructions:
Past participles occur in a rare construction in English which may be compared with the ablative absolute construction in Latin:
- With these words spoken, he turned and left.